It’s good when people speak clearly instead of playing word games. “Jews” is better than “global finance (derogatory)”; “anti-white” is better than “global majority”/ “ethnic minority”.
I’d like to elevate the discourse one step higher and identify who this ideology positively likes. At the top are African men. Women and Muslims are more marginal members of this coalition.
Yes – as I think I said somewhere in the post, democratists literally worship Africans, and this is an obvious mutation of the older idea of that race as the lowest form of humanity.
It's also amusing to find them constantly trying to manufacture evidence for large black populations in medieval England, random black royals, and so on, as if Africans literally spring out of the soil (whereas the 'world bourgeoisie' is of course indigenous to nowhere). You don't have to be a master psychologist to see where they're going with that.
Interesting article. Which nations comprise the America-led empire you speak of? They must include many non-White nations, if within this empire Whites are the minority.
I would say it includes most of them except Russia, China and a few 'rogue states', the others being subject to American military might, financial dependency, colour revolutions etc. But the physical dominance structure (the 'empire') is only one side of it; the other is the ideological apparatus (the 'church', so to speak), and that lays claim to the entire world.
The international Judaic pedo elites are pleased with this one
It’s good when people speak clearly instead of playing word games. “Jews” is better than “global finance (derogatory)”; “anti-white” is better than “global majority”/ “ethnic minority”.
I’d like to elevate the discourse one step higher and identify who this ideology positively likes. At the top are African men. Women and Muslims are more marginal members of this coalition.
Yes – as I think I said somewhere in the post, democratists literally worship Africans, and this is an obvious mutation of the older idea of that race as the lowest form of humanity.
It's also amusing to find them constantly trying to manufacture evidence for large black populations in medieval England, random black royals, and so on, as if Africans literally spring out of the soil (whereas the 'world bourgeoisie' is of course indigenous to nowhere). You don't have to be a master psychologist to see where they're going with that.
Interesting article. Which nations comprise the America-led empire you speak of? They must include many non-White nations, if within this empire Whites are the minority.
I would say it includes most of them except Russia, China and a few 'rogue states', the others being subject to American military might, financial dependency, colour revolutions etc. But the physical dominance structure (the 'empire') is only one side of it; the other is the ideological apparatus (the 'church', so to speak), and that lays claim to the entire world.